Friday 30 July 2021

XLII Hypnosis in the Inklings


I am not dealing with Charles Williams or Owen Barfield. I am dealing with the works of the two main ones, C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkien.

Narnia, by CSL:

  • Wood between the worlds - Digory and Polly are obviously in a hypnotic state (just from being there) and have to struggle to get out;
  • Digory pretended to feel hypnotised by the injunction at the bell and the hammer;
  • Doctor Cornelius would have been very inept as a magician if he had not been able to cast as sleeping spell;
  • The Lady of the Green Kirtle, for years, abuses hypnosis on Rilian, and for some minutes succeeds in doing so to the rescuers as well - until Puddleglum breaks the spell by making a scene;
  • Tirian is a hunter who knows how to set his inner clock for waking up at a specific time - a species of self hypnosis.


Silmarillion and related, JRRT:

  • Melian kind of hyponotises Elwe (Elu Thingol) for quite a long time;
  • Luthien hypnotises guards, Beren, Sauron and Morgoth;
  • Glaurung hypnotises - abusively - Turin, whose father may have been kind of hypnotised as well by Morgoth into seeing things a certain way.


LotR:

  • Hobbits hypnotised by old man willow and by the barrow downs into lying down to sleep at the wrong moment;
  • Tom Bombadil does a nice work of "refreshed after hypnosis" suggestions to wake them up.


It is fairly certain that they knew very well what hypnosis was, and perhaps someone of them or both, or another Inkling resorted to it./HGL

PS, forgot Legolas' self hypnosis allowing him to rest while awake, and obviously the druadan had a similar technique./HGL

Thursday 8 July 2021

XLI - Catholicism and Hypnosis


Is Hypnosis Evil? w/ Dr. Gerry Crete
26th of June 2021 | Pints With Aquinas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNn0IYtLfWw


1:57 "if you feel safe with the person, it should be fine"

Thank you very much.

In other words, if I take hypnosis for relaxation, through videos with labels like "power nap", "fractionation for calmness" and things like that, and avoid "past life regression", "slave hypnosis" and anything that's either directly superstitious or demeaning of the own liberty, and also avoid erotic hypnosis setting out to be such, I should be safe.

Now, Gerry Crete is not a theologian, but a Sedevacantist - who obviously doesn't trust decisions from residents of the Vatican after 1958 - took the trouble to find out the first decree of the relevant dicasterium, and it was, twofold:
  • hypnosis is a physical / natural means and trying to achieve natural results with it is (with due cautions) licit
  • trying to achieve strictly supernatural things by hypnosis is however a horrid superstition.


In other words - a power nap or quitting smoking or speaking to people with more confidence : licit ends. And for these, hypnosis is licit means. Peeping into a supposed previous life in your supposed cycle of reincarnations - superstitious and illicit.

"I think if you are doing hypnosis by yourself, I would worry about that"

Not what the dicasterium said back in 1800's and somewhat interested in the sense that he's a t h e r a p i s t and therefore interested in getting people to them.